what do you think? Into developed a policy with the insurance company that is supposed to provide full protection to investors for ...
what do you think?
Into developed a policy with the insurance company, which is supposed to provide full protection to investors on the partnership funds. Which means that an investor who inject the minimum amount of 20 a thousand dollars is expected to get the worst case of his full money back. The policy is limited to a single investment of 5 million dollars up to the sum of 150 million.
Into will charge the management of the partnership a management fee of 2% per annum plus VAT for a period of three years in advance (approximately 7% in total). In addition, the expenses of the prospectus and the insurance premium will be about 6% (one-time payment). In general, the expenses of preparing and publishing a prospectus range around 2%, so that the premium for insurance is about 1.5% per year (4.5% for three years).
Link to the original post in the United States Real Estate Forum on Facebook - Works on a desktop computer (To view the post must be members approved for the forum):
http://bit.ly/2GHlOOU
The original responses to the post can be read at the bottom of the current post page on the site or in the link to a post on Facebook and of course you are invited to join the discussion
A brilliant move in my eyes ..
An investor is interested in security before yielding from my experience
If he has insurance that promises him to get back his investment .. Sound Deal Briker and I was happy to invest with insurance or alternatively give investors the possibility to invest with another ring of protection and only for personal safety
This is the future in my opinion
Gilad Oz
First it is not low.
Second, you did not hear me say I was in favor
Thirdly, everything has its place in dispersion ... sum and risk
..and
Fourth… It is not always possible to guarantee 10-15 percent
Fifth .. If people want to know more Raz will read the first 2 pages in the prospectus and the chapter 6
Ido Neuman I would not touch a project like this for several reasons:
- You are part of another 50-100 people in the project and your impact is very small
- A project that is based only on improvement and not on a current return means that their money is at higher risk.
- Getting a 7% return is a very low return, I get my investors a return of 10-15% net from the rent and without improvement.
Unmarried suckers just change
LiorSalim
They are not going to be traded on the stock exchange.
Fetch me 20 a thousand dollars..Provides you more than 7% without lowercase..without closing you to 10 !!!!!! Years and without situations in which you will not receive the money
Iddo agrees with you, the information in the prospectus is far more important to the investor than the marketing information that emphasizes the things that sound and look good.
Regarding the investment consideration in the fund, I can see the article I posted to the group on the Globes website about a Harel investment fund that is not open to small investors. What is more important and valuable is the chain of reactions after the article touched on the advantages and disadvantages of investing through a large entity.
Another thing in this fund is that it is open to small investors due to a low entry threshold for investment (20 thousand dollars).
Do not understand people who go after marketing and do not read what is actually going to be…
Published a prospectus !!
Where you read ..
Not clear? You will consult
Should I start ???
I was with them at an office meeting and also read parts of the prospectus and presentation.
Currently in the first fund raised, they have already closed two projects out of 4-5 per fund.
The first project is at 1016 W. Stassney Lane Austin, TexasUSA. The cost is about $15M for 122 housing units, which comes out to about $123K per unit.
The second project is at 4021 Steck Ave, Austin, TX 78759, USA for 120 $ 15.5M housing units that will cost $ 130K per unit.
The significant part of the return that they expect to receive under the prospectus will come from the appreciation of the assets and their sale.
In addition, the tax payable on earnings is expected to be in the 26-27% range.
I would love to hear from people with experience in the field and know Texas and Austin in particular. What do you think of the properties and such investment?