Exit of seats and kibbutzim in the return transactions. So who said there was no right of restitution?
Exit of seats and kibbutzim in the return transactions. So who said there was no right of restitution?
Exit of seats and kibbutzim in the return transactions. So who said there was no right of restitution?
there is Connect to the system To post a comment.
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.
Only those who benefit from the above transactions are the construction companies and the manager.
This is because they exploit the kibbutzim and moshavim who do not understand anything and simply rob them of the land at a funny price.
I offer my help to all the kibbutzim and moshavim to manage the process with the manager and the contractors, which will leave them much more than what they are offered.
Yossi 0522550467
I was a witness and trading partner (even shameful about the cheating border) in the kibbutz movement and their power of land trading.
If the state comptroller examines it, the slime coming out of this building will be remembered for generations
Making capital wrongfully.
In the south of the country, the restitution agreement was in order to prevent minority members from taking over the land, in that the kibbutzim held and plowed land at some distance from their homes.
Kibbutz Erez, Ben Shemen & Co. do not own public land!
Why dandruff. Restitution deals have been operating in recent years. point. Good or bad. Another question. In my opinion, the exit is positive. Both for the benefit of the state and the prevention of stagnation in restoring agricultural lands that are being lost
Dandruff of the Eastern arc teeth in 3..2..1…