So what if there is a car? So what if 10 cranes or people connected to the crane have been killed since the beginning of the year…

Responses

1. 

   Nir Kadmon May 21

   Nothing seemed to change.
   The future government, like its predecessors, seems to be more self-centered and needs less.

2. 

   Yaron Chen May 21

   Today there are already 2 casualties from the cattle…. A completely crazy country.

3. 

   Jeremiah Neta May 21

   The land will be filled with monuments

4. 

   Jeremiah Neta May 21

   Require a memorial where they were killed. Then it will change

5. 

   Benjamin Benny Ergas May 21

   It's not a crane

6. 

   Eran Maor May 21

   Classic Israeli Dreams, What's New?

7. 

   Moshe Atami May 21

   כל עוד יש (חסינות) לעבריין בפועל ע”י חוק ישן נושן המאפשר להעביר את האחריות לאחר לא נראה שינוי אם זה לא חסינות אז מה זה?? רק להסביר שהאחר הוא מנהל העבודה שלא יודע שהוא מנוצל ע”י מעסיקו הסורר. בבקשה תראו ותבינו לבד למה לא יהיה שינוי מסתירים זאת מהציבור כדי שלא ידע למה יש תאונות??
   Please the twisted law.
   Charge of the offender in fact and his judgment
   243. (a) The occupier of a factory or the owner of a factory accused of an offense under this ordinance is entitled to demand that another person, whom he accuses as a criminal in fact, be brought before the court at the time set for the hearing of his accusation, provided that he does both of these:
   (1) shall file a lawful charge against the other person;
   (2) He will give the plaintiff no less than three days advance notice of his intention to do so.
   (b) The prosecutor will be entitled to interrogate the defendant or the husband if he gives evidence, or any witness he called to support the charge he filed, and bring rebuttal evidence.
   (c) If, after the commission of the offense has been proven, the occupant or the owner has proven to the court's opinion both of these:
   (1) He has diligently applied the provisions of this ordinance and of any regulation pursuant to it that pertains to the matter;
   (2) Another person as mentioned in subsection (a) committed the offense in question without consent, ignoring or malicious omission on the part of the perpetrator or the husband, -
   The appellant and the husband will not be guilty of the offense, but the same person will be convicted, and the court may, in his discretion, be liable to pay the expenses involved in the trial.
   (d) If at the time of discovery of an offense the following four were ascertained to the satisfaction of the inspector:
   (1) The occupier or the owner of the factory has duly exercised his diligence in applying the provisions of this ordinance and of any regulation according to which it pertains to the matter;
   (2) who is the person who committed the offense;
   (3) the offense was committed without the consent, neglect or malicious omission of the perpetrator or the husband;
   (4) The offense was committed in violation of the instructions of the tenant or owner, -
   The person prosecuted will be prosecuted, according to the commissioner, in fact, without the appellant or husband being sued first.

8. 

   Ronen Lavi May 21

   Assumes that nothing will change, the government does not care and the current Israeli is Hafar….

9. 

   Roee Ben Halevi May 21

   Nothing will change as long as the state is responsible for safety.
   The state establishes safety regulations and is the monopoly of supervision.
   The state failed (as in everything the state touches).

   We need to move to the British model - the privatization of supervision.

10. 

    Kobi Saar May 21

    Why not publish such cases with the site name and contractor and simply send them to the Ministry of Economy and Industry that will send them fines?
    If there are not enough inspectors and enforcement you can always send photos and make them easier to enforce